Author(s): Marcello Forcellini, Andrea Vivoli

Email(s): ,

DOI: 10.5958/2454-2679.2019.00004.5   

Address: Marcello Forcellini, Andrea Vivoli
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 7,      Issue - 1,     Year - 2019

The paper starts analyzing the evolution of social media in the financial field according to a new phenomenon, called social trading. Precisely, there is an increasing number of trading platforms which enable all segments of investors - such as the retail ones - to operate in financial markets with risky financial contracts called contracts for difference (CFD). The paper describes how the on-line trading platforms of CFDs work and how the new international regulations are changing the CFD market. It also provides an overview of the main tools and services that trading platforms are offering that are driving the social trading to become a reference social media in the financial field. Finally, the paper examines some possible challenges that the social trading could face following the new regulations and market trends in order to protect investors from eventually adopting insane asset allocation strategies.

Cite this article:
Marcello Forcellini, Andrea Vivoli. From the Social Media to the Social Trading: A Financial Perspective. International J. Advances in Social Sciences.2019;7(1-2):15-22. doi: 10.5958/2454-2679.2019.00004.5

“European Securities and Markets Authority Decision (EU) 2018/796 of 22 May 2018 to temporarily restrict contracts for differences in the Union in accordance with Article 40 of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council”. Official Journal of the European union. 1.6.2018. On-line source:             
Borsa Italiana (2008). “CFD: Contract for Difference”. On-line source:
Contracts for “Counterparty Risk in Trading CFDs”. On-line source:
Contracts for “Why are CFDs not permitted in the USA?”. On-line source:
ESMA (2012). “MiFID Questions and Answers Investor Protection & Intermediaries”. On-line source:

ESMA Press Release (2018). “ESMA adopts final product intervention measures on CFDs and binary options”. On-line source:
eToro (2018). “About eToro”. On-line source:
Financial Conduct Authority (2015), “Copy trading”.  On-line source:
Forex Dictionary. “Social Trading”. On-line source:
Investment Dealers Association of Canada (2007). “Regulatory Analysis of Contracts for Differences (CFDs)”. On-line source:
James O’Neill (2017). “CFD regulation and the global impact – A comprehensive guide”. On-line source:
Jan H Kietzmann, Kristopher Hermkens, Ian P. McCarthy, and Bruno S. Silvestre (2011). "Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media". Business Horizons. Volume 54. Pages 241–251.
Jan-Philip Schade (2017), “On the informational content of social trading strategies” Working paper. On-line source:$FILE/dis4691.pdf
Jonathan A. Obar and Steve Wildman (2015). “Social Media Definition and the Governance Challenge: An Introduction to the special Issue”. Telecommunications Policy. Volume 39. Pages 745-750
Lucy Battersby (2009). “ASIC raises alarm over new CFD trade risks”. The Sydney Morning Herald. On-line source:
Manuel Ammann, Nic Schlaub (2016). “Social Interaction and Investing: Evidence from an Online Social Trading Network”, Swiss Institute of Banking and Finance, University of St. Gallen. On-line source:
Megan Butler – Financial Conduct Authority (2018). “Providers and distributors of contracts for difference (CFD) products: resolving failings which may cause significant consumer harm”. On-line source:
Neil Glassman (2010). “Social Day Trading Comes to Facebook”. On-line source:
Shazir Mucklai (2017). “Social Investing Equals More Opportunity”. HuffPost. On-line source:

Recomonded Articles:

Author(s): Marcello Forcellini, Andrea Vivoli

DOI: 10.5958/2454-2679.2019.00004.5         Access: Closed Access Read More

International Journal of Advances in Social Sciences (IJASS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal, correspondence in the fields....... Read more >>>


Recent Articles